>>291916I don't think scientific method has any restrictions of the sort really, like it was made to study anything anywhere, including "self-modifying" systems, "chaotic and probabilistic" systems etc
>If a rock has "inner world" it cannot be actually understood by scientific method as we know it thenIt's more like maybe it can but not right now so that claim overall is non-falsifiable (which is fine for that context I think)
One could say that I just nuked the difference because it simply is possible to do so, like the separation seems to be artificial to a degree, i.e. a fantasy. And one could see the reality as a wonder-world of soulful entities talking to each other OR some sorta hellhole of mindless particles (that includes YOU xD) - like, perhaps the difference is only in the name really.
>quantum physicsIDK if quantum effects could be used as evidence of my kinda universe actually existing but like bruh, quantum physics IS actual science, *of course* it follows the scientific method. Go sleep xD