>>248924Sorry, my Friend, Ive been playing with the little computer and forgot to look at the clock… Well, I did no experiment yet, but Im close to doing dat (wat did I do? Well, I wanted to make the old laptop as a building machine and it seems I figured out how to do it with schroot and stuff. And other thing, eh, doesnt sound like I did a lot…)
Dunno, I have nothing against looking positively at things. I just think there is no reason to not settle for the best, at least practical best
Dunno. Is there any claim for me to make about objectiveness dat wont devolve into Christianity by you? Dont get me wrong, I dont think you are incorrect, maybe you are right, but Christianity is not all there is or something like dat. Any way, saying dat there is no objective and saying dat there is objective is just an commitment. I believe dat people are able to agree about things generally, and trying to say otherwise just doesnt stick for me. Thats all I mean by objectiveness I guess, it is more lax than your absolute objectivity. Absolute objectivity is something you made up here to make it easier for you to attack Christianity, and dats okay, I support you on this. But dat aint have anything to do with wat I believe in, or say. Any way, wat I want to say, is dat people generally agree dat killing is wrong by all reason, and I believe this is one evidence of killing being objectively bad. I know, youll say, dat "but you dont spell out the reason why do they believe dat. Christianity", and youll be right. But wat about other people? Other religions? So, maybe youll see the problem now, and have more understanding why I tell you dat I "believe" and not "know", dat I only have an "evidence" and not hard truth. The reasons from previous post meant to be taken as evidence and not truth (It seems dat my original claim was only about universality of badness and I only uses objective in the context of bad book can be judged objectively. Yeah, you jumped very high here, I guess. I explained to you a way of how to judge a book objectively, you entirely ignored it, took objectiveness out of context, make it broad, and all dat only to attack Christianity. I agree with you on Christianity, I hope you understand dat)