>>309524Dunno. AI didnt throw license and copyright in the bin, it had become an emergency and exempted itself from law. So, in this way, it is just above law, it cannot be prosecuted (ie AI firms as the real responsible) because the legal regime has no motivation to enforce own law in this particular instance. So, I dont think there can counterargument be made, ot I misundertand some thing
There is hardly any normalization for AI, I mean, it can be regulated, but we conceive AI as supragovernmental so there is difficulty. Law is necessarily a land phenomena, so, if AI is global and has to be subject to law, to the law of which land should it be subjected? So, when AI will be integrated into the law system, itll look very differently from today. I dunno how it will look, but as of now, there is no effective enforcement of law, first, because the law is itself ineffective and second there is no motivation/incentive to enforce the law
So, dunno. Its true that law havent been created for this scale, but we have law about ocean and stuff, so, we can have law about AI too. Only difference between ocean and AI is dat AI benefits a lot of people, states, companies, …, in quite direct way but ocean benefits all in indirect way. In quite not obvious way