>>301563Eh, actually, I dont view oldness as big uglifier. Some people are clearly handsome even while being old, even while being visibly old, so I think beauty, particularly natural beauty, is not easily lost with age. Though there is probably more people who age badly. So maybe if you want to preserve your natural beauty you could do so I guess, at least I know that many people could. Wat I wanted to say is dat if you view yourself as good looking or watever, isnt it true that you would be good looking even in old age? I mean, natural beauty transcends old age, any way, I think being afraid of being ugly in old age is kinda silly but you probably have far different understanding of ugly
Eh, sometimes I thought about dat not gonna lie. Wat problem with simulation theory I have is that it is particular. Hard to describe. It centers on a ego and makes ego really important, so, simulation theory gives way too much importance to individual. Wat I want to say is dat I feel like if we were simulated, would we be really having so strong of boundaries between the self and the other selves? But it is undeniable reality that borders between our egos are strong, and not only that, we are able to test other egoes and this on its own kinda tells us that we cannot be really simulated. Because it is spontaneous, it is undefined wat happens when we test other egoes, but in simulation it is implied dat everything is defined at every point in time. So, we are not in simulation because spontaneity and random even is undeniable reality, in simulation random is impossible
Any way, it might be true that we never existed in a meaningful way though nonetheless. After all, it is impossible for everyone to live a meaningful life at once if meaning is derived from some action. Wat I want to say is dat if meaningful life was to be a parent and everyone could be a parent then wat is the value of being a parent? Wat I want to say is dat value and meaning only exist in comparison. For example, for being a parent to be meaningful, not being a parent must be first negative of being meaningful life. So we kinda compare wat is more meaningful from wat is less meaningful life. Then we have to have value of being a parent, and generally, when everyone has the same thing, then people tend to take it for granted. So, if all were a parent, it wouldnt be meaningful life no more because value of meaningful life would tank the second there is no comparison to what is not meaningful life
Any way, so, I guess many people would notice that 98% of humans live kinda meaningless lives. But is it a problem? After all, even if it is, it cannot be resolved. So, I think, here is where fear of death most visible. Many people recognize that their life is just kinda not meaningful, but they continue living. Because its unknown of wat is beyond death. It is really scary to entertain this thought that it is unproven if dying worse than living. So, people kinda have to find a justification for living. Kinda just have to not stop and think. Because if they do it is really easy to realize that nothing matters and every thing sucks. Because it is true to some degree. So wat justifies living? And wat justifies not dying? Fear seem to really good at justifying living