No. 267471 [PM]
This nostalgy… a perverse emotion, that of a red autumn leaves or a spring trickle. A many a guy had been defeated by her comforting graces, for when she embraces she holds with arms that have heaven in hands… the hands of Goddess of life itself keeps the grip on our hearts like a vociferous beast with gentleness of a pure maiden
What is the old village if not history or the inception of one's life? The account of all the nescessary steps for existing as an individual, from the cradle to the out of it, all the things we come to remember in our reckoning. Something that is old and good, that serves well the purpose, that fails to do unright, that is what this sublime, teethering saddness, that is too easy to dismiss as frivolous and too difficult to challenge
That I will have as my adversary. This feeling I will have as mortal enemy for that it does me more harm than good, makes me remember things of the great time and forget the moment, this moment in which I purported to live a life that is at least not half so bad. And yet, in this moment of nostalgia, I forget it all, my emotional memory gets wiped clean and gets replaced with the imaginary fictions of some approximations of how it mustve felt so good back then when something was… as if it is right now something wasnt
I shall fight this nostalgia with any means available to me. I will spare no breath, to drown this feeling in the water I will not hesitate, for that everyone will be a fierce beast when faced with unprovoked infringements, superflous attacks of the past on the present, dillution of life as it is. There is nothing good in this feeling, there is nothing good in what it does
From this old village it has the beginning. To reminiscence of the village itself, to be contained in it, to never look outside the old house. To stand by the windowsill and wonder if the life ever moves forward, claiming in airquotes that everyting is still on the outside. When sun changes the moon and vice versa, it is not that the natural states of things changed, it is that I in my perception, in my receiving of the sensory data, can tell, what was before and after, or, the state of things as they are in the current moment. Destroying history at the spot and allowing the nostalgy to exist in its unabashed, unapologetic form. The thesis is thus, it is not that our physical self doesnt change, it is that this change matters little, as the real change is hidden, somewhere we cannot apparently see, something secret and mystical
The change that happens in itself, that has no agent, that just happens. That is the vehicle of nostalgia: annihilation, desolation of space before it, then putting a transmuted meaning in place. The devouring fiction with intention on continuing forever, pure artificality, completely deranged syndrome of madman in a daze, in a dream of infinite pleasure and after which comes melancholy. Why must people live a life? That would be the question, but thats a misguided effort, considering that the change is in itself and has no intention. The change is for change itself, it has no directionality or purpose, it exist in its own interiority. Not people change but the interioriy of them, and the exteriority never changes for that even if it is, the changes are so dimished compared to the spiritual transfigurations that the outside doesnt even matter at all
Is it really the case? It is not. If our interiority matters so much then why must our expressions of interiority must be poor? For example, if the body is the exterior then should it be receiving more effort than anything, because interior is unprovable, it is not explicable by nature, we must attest to the importance of our interior by furnishing the exterior with emotionality and significance. Then interior cannot exist without the exterior, in fact, it is the exterior which gives the interior life. Without the exterior interiority does not exist, it is only by the exterior someting can be hidden, like a tree which shadows objects from the sun
Perhaps there is no externality or internality, maybe our physicality is the life. Maybe the meaning is hidden inside the skin, that there is no other trick or valut to hide under. Perhaps, our life is the expression of us in the moment, that it is a statement on our existence, the undeniable right to being
This will be my weapon, a deadly spear that I will throw at the heart of the nostalgia. I know its weak points, with a steady hand it can be defeated with a single blow… but it disarms me in my most vulnerable moment, the moment of the thrust of truth. It defeats me without a weapon, by laying down its hands and surrender. Nostalgia knows that I have no guts to follow on my intentions, for the risks of losing it forever is one emotion. Would be my life better without it? The vice speaks in unconspicious ways, It beckons closer the sinner to do the sin again, and again, and again… regressing into infinite pleasure again, the plasure of dreaming and imagining
In my dream it was all different. It was reality more real, perhaps, there is no alternative to the dream that Im having. In it, everything is better, the crooks had been fixed and all the unstraights been straightened neat and tidy. In it, my theory, my justice for the injustice. And all I have in my dream is madness of violence as the current injustice is not resolvable, all what could be done is violent demolition of order to be replaced with the order that I would like better. And in this violence my dream completes its purpose, in giving me pleasure in this imagining without solution to any injustice at all
All what follows is profound sadness. Nostalgia has won and annihilated me and replaced me with someone unlike me, with someone who is unknown to own self. Someone who dreams of being the better me
No. 267800 [PM]
This post makes me feel such a nostalgy of when i first heard you critize nostalgy..
jokes aside, i think nostalgy serves a purpose, you cant really feel cotinuity of self without it. Its also related social bonding and such. Wouldnt human just be lifeless machine if we stored memories without emption attached to it? you may then say that nostalgy isnt truth.. well yeah, its not really truthful, because its filtered memories so you only see the good side, but isnt that positive side of it rather than negative? You may also say that well dwell on it. Well its better to dwell on positive side of things rather than negative. Anyway, its fools errand trying to fight against it, like trying to colden your heart against feeling. The story of life can only matter holistically rather than just progressing forward mechanistically without emotion attached to events.
No. 267805 [PM]
>>267800Is nostalgy just memory with feeling? Nah, dat aint it. And I dont really think nostalgia is always positive either…
So, wats nostalgia? Nostalgia is a way of recollection of past events that satisfy ourselves emotionally. Where recollection of past events are not necessarily true or actually took place, the past events may not be true and may not be as they were remembered. Thats the biggest thing I dislike about nostalgia, is dat its fake
So, I dunno. I think you are being uncharitable. Dunno, lifeless machine, mechanistically without emotion, those look like a bludgeon to me… The story isnt meant for it to attack your belief, I mean I knew you would be interested, but the point of it was not to discredit nostalgy per se or discredit you believing in it… It is about dreams actually, and perhaps thesis of this srory is dat nostalgia is just dream with more intense feeling to it… (I wont debate you on your points, because I dont disagree dat nostalgia isnt important to humans or dat it serves purpose…)
No. 267808 [PM]
I could say dat we as humans are driven to live by the nostalgia. I said up there dat nostalgia is a way of remembering, but more intuitive way is to think of it as an emotion or feeling. But dat is wrong, as when we feel pain we kinda dont need to be remembering it in the moment… So, nostalgia is not an feeling but a way to feel, in this case, a way to recollect about things
We nostalgy for the same reason as we dream or day dream in this case, there is little distinction for me but when I say dream I mean day dream. We dont dream for no thing, we do it because we are lacking in something and we want to satisfy it somwhow. It is same for nostalgia, we nostalgic because in this current moment we are lacking the (imagined) satisfaction that once was
The memory in nostalgia is not direct, it is a copy of a memory, used for creative imaginin of scenarios. So, actually, nostalgia is immediate: it is not about past at all. Me, putting anime image to every post is nostalgia because I live this way and remember this way when it feel like some thing special and I continue as if in the spirit of how I started posting anime picture. This is me dreaming, not of the past, but the present, to satisfy me in my need… where the need is not really clear. So, in this way, I continue to be like I am from a reflex of glorified past that I have in my mind, because I cant disprove it, I have no alternative to the memory as I have it. So, history is very important to both dreaming and nostalgia, I wont talk about it much, but yeah it is not a question if it is all true, it is a question if history as we have in memory actually means any thing at all or it is all wat we can be…
No. 267815 [PM]
Lastly, I guess without elaborating on history it wouldn't be complete wat I want to say, history is not always personal or at least it is not equal to our experience
I said about past in my mind that there is no alternative wat I mean is dat I could not be someone who Im not. But history, in wider sense, always have an alternative to it. It is just dat we as individuals are unique in this way dat we have undeniable history in our memory that as far as we know ourselves cannot be disproven
However, thats just one way of how it can be. There is also an shared history, a shared memory in which we exist. So, our personal history is interior to the shared history which is exterior. So, wat I want to say ia this
Historically, humanity had many projects of bringing humans together using some categories or belongings. In Nazi Germany, the strongest manufacture of shared history, the historical contingent was that the new man will be achieved through a revolution. So, everyone participated in this project because the history of individual peoples had no contradiction to this view of Nazi imagining of history. Nazis viewed society as decadent and impure, wat they wanted is to clean the nation of the impurities and decadence where ideal people would live. This shared history was all about people, it was all about bring people together. These are positive aspects of Nazism, there are also negative aspects of Nazism, like dat it is impossible and it resulted in unimaginable cruelty. But dats the point, even Nazis didnt like Nazi cruelty, so, wat they did is to write an appealing history where contingent of future is overwhelmingly positive, comforting… So, we exist in two history spaces at the same time, some times our shared history can match the personal history, but dat is not always the case, and we can just denounce the exterior… which is equivalent to dying, but dats other thing…