/bs/ - backstory

Is he saying he likes Vlad Puta? Wats up with it, he is not first to suggest dat

Good/Bad are such retarded meaningless buzzwords. Good at what? Bad at what?

Iranian gov. is very efficient, has it's own niche local industry/production (russia itself having relied on it's drones) and has managed to stay deep in power despite being isolated by it's neughbors and western cunts, but also is founded on pantsu on head retarded principles and wastes endless money on projecting power, annoying israelis/ameris. Imagine how good Iran would be if only all that time money and effort were invested on something smarter rather than retarded desert beefs. To Iran's merit, it doesn't seem nearly as corrupt as most other third world countries and is less corrupt than the Shah's so okay. Also one astounding achievement is that it's so remarkably well structured/organized that decapitation attacks aren't enough to break it up.

russian gov. is also pretty stable and has greatly improved local economy and still has a working industry (every 3rd world cunt used to buy them S-300 and russian planes… also russia develops other stuff locally, russia has a surprisingly good medical r&d complex despite being, well, russia). russia has smartly invested in it's raw resource production and actually attempted to use it as political leverage more than once, unlike other shitholes such as Vuvuzele. However russia also wasted endless resources on pointless kc tier shit and lost it's most profitable market. Putin, despite being fucking staffas, is a very smart and cunning guy. But it still remains to be seen stable the gov. will stay once he is gone though. The state apparatus seems remarkably well built (despite the corruption and discrepancies) but still hasn't gone through the ultimate test every monarchy has to go through (line of secession).

>>255462
In Iran, big government subsidized corporations had priority over anything other and that has made inflation jump up to Venezuela level when the government ran out of money to support the special conversion rate mechanism which enabled it in first place. There is no efficiency. You ignore the sanctions too and say, basically, dat Iran couldve done something else. It couldnt and current US Iran war is testament to it

I wouldnt know about Russia though. Dat was interesting. Want Puta gone, thats all

good people = everyone who is not a billionaire
bad people = billionaires
goverments = billionaires taxing the good people and making the good people hate each other by false left/right division

what we need is more dead billionaires, not more dead people, mmkay?

>>255465
kthxbae

>>255464
>efficiency
I wasn't trying to imply it's economy is efficient, but rather the political structure.

> You ignore the sanctions
I didn't.

It's economy is pretty bad but at least it *has* an economy with it's own research, development, and manufacturing.

>Iran couldve done something else
?

>I wouldnt know about Russia though
lol

They don't have to be good
They're morally right though
Haven't bombed any children's schools yet
Did blow up two related old Israelis tho, small comfort

>>255477
Retarded *

>>255476
Alright, well, fine. I dont believe dat Iran had any other option than militarization though

>>255483
Iran only militarized after the Iraq war , that's when germans we're selling saddam Hussein gas and Americans were selling them weapons and actually attacked them a few times
From about then they adopted a defensive posture and had the missile build up
Seems to have worked out well
Iranian oil exports have went up since the war and controlling the strait

>>255483
I dislike Iranian gov. but I do respect it's resolve, determination, consistency, and limited success despite the adversities.

It's kind of like watching the half blind village schizo break it's own glasses (had his reasons, the optician is literally jewish and charged him too much money). I respect that he found new ways to keep reading without his glasses (learned braile, bought braile books) but still think he is retarded and the jewish optician will eventually break his legs (optician thinks braile books are bad for business).
But even if this guy somehow manages to fight back (not really, he can't do much), he will still stay schizo and blind.

Not sure why I even came up with such an oddly specific analogy, enjoy the read I guess.

Is this a chicago pole take or a random take from the net